Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law was recently recognized by the Santa Ana City Council for alumna Suzanne Fidler’s (’05) participation as a volunteer attorney in a citizenship fair co-sponsored by the city and Public Law Center.
Suzanne Fidler
In early April, Fidler joined 100 legal volunteers who offered their services and advice to more than 800 attendees of a citizenship fair in Santa Ana. The event was sponsored by the city of Santa Ana, Public Law Center, OC Labor Federation, OCCORD and Active Learning. Volunteers assisted with processing applications and provided citizenship information. According to the city of Santa Ana, approximately 600 citizenship applications were processed over the course of the day.
Fidler, who is an attorney and physician, decided to volunteer after hearing about the opportunity through the Public Law Center. As a volunteer attorney she reviewed citizenship applications and explained the process to attendees.
She said that the opportunity to serve as a volunteer attorney through PLC was an exciting and satisfying experience, and gave her a chance to not only benefit the community but also get a glimpse into an area of law she does not often have occasion to work in.
“It was delightful to assist many promising people who were truly excited to become citizens,” Fidler said. “I enjoyed working with people from many different backgrounds with the common goal to achieve U.S. citizenship. It was an honor to assist people who have waited many years to become citizens.”
Are you an alumnus? Have you recently changed firms, been promoted, published or made partner and would like to be featured? Send us a class note!
Above: Assistant Director of Career Services Oscar Teran (fourth from left) with volunteers recognized by the Santa Ana City Council
This short essay was written for the Touro Law Review’s Associate Dean’s Symposium on “Student-Edited Law Reviews: Future Publication Platforms.” It maintains that the Associate Dean for Research has a responsibility to shape and develop the scholarly culture and intellectual life of the law school. Part of that charge should be to aid the student-edited law reviews in their contribution to that enterprise and to help those reviews evolve. In addition to their pedagogical value for the students (developing editing, reasoning, research, and writing skills), these reviews play a part in sending signals to the outside world of the scholarly commitment of a law school. And, most importantly, student-edited law reviews serve the higher value of distributing knowledge and disseminating legal thought that addresses doctrinal clarity, unpacks theoretical uncertainties, creates foundations for reform, or otherwise presents legal solutions to critical social issues.
Earlier in the day, LL.M. graduates met in Kennedy Hall for a private reception recognizing their accomplishments, prior to the official commencement ceremony on Friday. Graduating students Rahil Attawala, Chinweike Peter Ezike, Oghenetuvie Loveth Omasheye and Sonya Jifkins served as class speakers, thanking their families, Fowler School of Law faculty and fellow graduates for their support and help in reaching their goal. 
Proponents of legislative patent reform argue that the current patent system perversely impedes true innovation in the name of protecting a vast web of patented inventions, the majority of which are never even commercialized for the benefit of the public. Opponents of such legislation argue that comprehensive, prospective patent reform legislation would harm the incentive to innovate more than it would curb the vexatious practices of non-practicing entities. But while the “Innovation Act” wallows in Congress, there is a common law tool to protect innovation from the patent thicket lying right under our noses: the reverse doctrine of equivalents. Properly applied, this judge-made doctrine can be used to excuse infringement on a case-by-case basis if the court determines that the accused product is substantially superior to the patented invention, despite proof of literal infringement. Unfortunately, the reverse doctrine is disfavored by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and therefore rarely applied. It was not always so. This article is the first comprehensive study of published opinions applying the reverse doctrine of equivalents to excuse infringement between 1898, when the Supreme Court established the doctrine, and the 1982 creation of the Federal Circuit. This “lost precedent” reveals a flexible doctrine that takes into account the technological and commercial superiority of the accused product to any embodiment of the patented invention made by the patent-holder. An invigorated reverse doctrine of equivalents could therefore serve to protect true innovations from uncommercialized patents on a case-by-case basis, without the potential harm to the innovation incentive that prospective patent legislation might cause.
In his testimony, Professor Eggert offered examples of ways that “professional” fantasy sports players can prey on recreational players by creating a perfect winning lineup using complex algorithms to predict any number of factors. To combat this, he suggested higher regulation of the industry including limiting the number of fantasy lineups that any player can enter, labeling high earners so that recreational players know what caliber of player they are up against, providing services to gambling addicts, preventing insider playing and adding regulators to oversee games. 
Even though effective evidence-based juvenile offender rehabilitation programs have been available for twenty years, such programs are underutilized and frequently misperceived as too ineffective, costly, and lenient because they fail to satisfy society’s retributive need to punish offenders. But the public, policy makers, prosecutors, and judges will support and utilize evidence-based programs when apparent conflicts between the demand for evidence-based programs, concerns about program effectiveness and costs, and the felt need for punishment are reconciled. This chapter outlines how this can be accomplished by using evidence-based persuasion strategies to effectively communicate the compatibility of these three goals.
Parekh’s book, 
The story behind the move toward marijuana’s legality is a story of disruptive forces to the incumbent legal and physical landscape. It affects incumbent markets, incumbent places, the incumbent regulatory structure, and the legal system in general which must mediate the battles involving the push for relaxation of illegality and adaptation to accepting new marijuana-related land uses, against efforts toward entrenchment, resilience, and resistance to that disruption.
As a second-year student planning on a future in litigation, Gabrielle LaCarre (JD ’17) knew a judicial externship was not the most traditional route. But rather than pursue work at a private law firm, she opted for a chance to see things from the other side of the bench through an externship at the Orange County Superior Court, where she found her passion outside of her comfort zone.
The law governing police interrogation provides perverse incentives. For criminal suspects, the law rewards obstruction and concealment. For police officers, it honors deceit and psychological aggression. For the courts and the rest of us, it encourages blindness and rationalization. This Article contends that the law could help foster better behaviors. The law could incentivize criminals to confess without police trickery and oppression. It could motivate police officers involved in obtaining suspect statements to avoid chicanery and duress. And, it could summon courts and the rest of us to speak more truthfully about whether suspect admissions are the product of informed, intelligent, and voluntary decisions. States could promote these outcomes by providing valuable sentencing concessions to those who confess.